<img height="1" width="1" style="display:none" src="https://www.facebook.com/tr?id=314834185700910&amp;ev=PageView&amp;noscript=1">

Understanding QDROs: What University of Chicago Employees Need to Know About Dividing Retirement Assets

image-table

If you are a resident in a US state, you should know how your University of Chicago retirement assets may be affected by the Qualified Domestic Relations Order . 

What is a Qualified Domestic Relations Order (QDRO)?

A qualified domestic relations order (QDRO) is a court judgment, decree, or order establishing the marital property rights of a spouse, former spouse, child, or dependent of a University of Chicago pension plan participant with respect to certain qualified retirement plans. Several requirements and restrictions apply.

To What Extent Are Retirement Assets Subject to Divorce Court Jurisdiction?

A University of Chicago retirement plan is a form of property. Like houses, cars, and bank accounts, a retirement plan can be divided between spouses at the time of a divorce. For example, if one spouse participates in a University of Chicago pension plan at work while the other spouse remains at home to care for the children, a judge has numerous options with respect to the retirement plan. Among other choices, he or she can award all of the pension to the working spouse, award all of it to the nonworking spouse, or split it equally (50/50). Judges often use QDROs to effect these pension assignments. In a marriage of long duration, a pension plan may be one of the most valuable marital assets.

How Are Retirement Plans Classified?

Many different kinds of retirement plans exist, with individual retirement accounts ( IRAs ) being one of the more common forms. In terms of employer-sponsored retirement plans, plans are classified as either qualified or nonqualified. Basically, qualified plans are those that satisfy federal requirements and are afforded special tax treatment. Most qualified plans can be further categorized as either defined contribution plans or defined benefit plans.

  • Defined contribution plans--Each participant in a University of Chicago defined contribution plan has an individual account. When you retire, you're entitled to receive your entire account balance. Funding depends on the type of plan. With some plans, the employees are the only ones who contribute, and with others, the employers do all the contributing or may match employee contributions dollar for dollar (or according to a certain percentage). Typical examples of defined contribution plans include 401(k) plans and profit-sharing plans.
  • Defined benefit plans--A University of Chicago defined benefit plan does not use individual accounts. Instead, benefits for the participants in the plan are fixed under a particular formula. Specified benefits are paid to participants based on such factors as age, length of service, and amount of compensation. Generally, the plan promises to pay the employee a certain amount per month at retirement time based on enumerated factors.

Before you think about dividing pension plans, it's important to understand the difference between defined contribution plans and defined benefit plans.

What Requirements and Restrictions Apply to QDROs?

A QDRO provides for child support, alimony payments, or marital property rights for a spouse, former spouse, child, or other dependent of a qualified plan participant and is made pursuant to a state domestic relations law. It creates or recognizes the existence of the right of the individual other than the plan participant (i.e., the alternate payee) to receive all or a portion of a participant's benefits under a qualified retirement plan.

Featured Video

Articles you may find interesting:

Loading...

A QDRO must satisfy certain requirements. It must clearly specify:

  • The name and last known mailing address of the participant and each alternate payee covered by the order
  • The amount or percentage of the participant's benefits the plan must pay to each alternative payee (or the manner in which such amount or percentage is to be determined)
  • The number of payments or periods to which the order relates, and
  • Each qualified retirement plan to which the order applies

However, a QDRO may not require the plan to do any of the following: 

  • Mandate increased benefits
  • Pay benefits to an alternate payee that must already be paid to a different alternate payee under another QDRO, or
  • Provide a type or form of benefit (or any option) not otherwise provided under the plan

For instance, the QDRO can't require the plan to provide cost-of-living increases if the plan doesn't already have cost-of-living provisions. Furthermore, a spouse's plan can't allocate 60 percent of the benefits to his or her former spouse if 50 percent of the benefits had previously been allocated to another prior spouse.

In What Ways May University of Chicago Retirement Plans Be Divided Pursuant to a  QDRO?

The QDRO specifies what the plan administrator is to do with the spouse's share of the plan. If under the plan a participant has no right to an immediate cash payment, a QDRO can't require the plan administrator to make an immediate cash payment to a spouse. Instead, a QDRO will probably be used to segregate plan assets into a subtrust for the benefit of the alternate payee-spouse, with cash distributions made at the earliest time they would be permitted under plan provisions.

Defined contribution plans are easy to value because the money is in an individual account and the plan administrator usually provides a quarterly report of the value. Defined benefit plans can pose a problem, however, and often require the services of an actuary to ascertain the present value of the fund. An actuary may be necessary, for example, if your eventual pension payout is tied to your compensation during your three highest paid years.

Example(s):  John is 50 years old and has a defined benefit plan that has no cash value right now. When John retires, he  currently expects to receive $1,200 per month. His ex-wife, Mary, will get a portion of the payout. If there is a 50 percent split of  the present value according to a QDRO, John and Mary will each get $600 per month at retirement time. However, if John actually  receives $1,800 per month when he retires, Mary will still only get $600 per month.

Segregation of Plan Assets

One option is to segregate the alternate payee's portion of the plan until the employee reaches retirement age. At that time, the alternate payee can access the funds. With this approach, the alternate payee is treated as a participant in the plan. The employee's defined contribution plan balance (or defined benefit plan accrued benefit) is valued as of a certain date, and that benefit is divided between the participant and the alternate payee in accordance with the QDRO. Once divided, the alternate payee is treated similarly to a terminated participant with a vested deferred benefit.

There are certain advantages to this approach. For example, if you're the alternate payee, you're probably assured of receiving some retirement income in the future. Also, you won't have to deal with the problems of how to invest your money right now and how to value the plan today.

However, staying in the plan maintains your economic ties with your ex-spouse, so you might lose some money if your ex-spouse takes early retirement. Also, you will not be able to control the investment decisions for your share of the retirement assets. And finally, your share of the plan will generally not be accessible to you until your ex-spouse reaches retirement age.

Current Distribution of Plan Assets

the plan allows, the plan administrator can distribute (to the alternate payee) the full amount of money due. The alternate payee can then either keep the money and pay tax on it now, or roll it into an IRA within 60 days, delaying taxation until later. There are also certain advantages to this approach. For example, if you need cash now for living expenses, you can keep all of the distribution. Also, you're able to control the investment decisions.

There are some drawbacks. For example, you may be subject to income tax (and perhaps the 10 percent penalty tax) if you don't roll the money into an IRA account within 60 days. Also, requesting a current distribution requires you to make your own investment decisions. And finally, you'll lose the long-term tax-sheltering advantage as well as the retirement savings if you spend the money now.

Tip:  The IRS has authority to waive the 60-day rule for rollovers under certain circumstances, such as proven hardship.

Aside From QDROs, What Options May Spouses Consider With Respect to Retirement Plan Assets?

One option is to trade retirement assets for something else. For example, a divorcing couple can simply decide that one spouse gets the entire retirement plan and the other gets the house plus alimony. Or perhaps the other spouse gets a big cash buyout right now instead of a claim on the pension assets.

There are advantages to avoiding QDROs. You will save time and money by not having to draft a QDRO. QDROs can be very expensive, especially when actuaries must be hired. Trading assets can simplify the property settlement considerably, which saves attorney's fees. Also, you may be able to trade for an asset you really want, like the house.

However, you may jeopardize your future financial security if you relinquish pension rights today. Also, you and your spouse may not have enough other assets to make a fair division if one of you keeps the entire retirement plan. And if the retirement plan is a defined benefit plan, it will have to be valued in order to determine what amount of other assets would make an equitable offset.

Tip:  Remember that QDROs don't apply to most nonqualified retirement plans, such as certain annuity plans and certain deferred  compensation plans. So, if your spouse's plan is a nonqualified one, the specific QDRO rules may not have to be followed.

Tip:  Also, the QDRO rules don't apply to IRAs. Nevertheless, it is possible for a QDRO to require a distribution of pension benefits  to an employee and then a transfer of the distribution to an IRA for the benefit of the former spouse.

When Retirement Plans Are Divided Pursuant to a Court Order, What Are the Income-tax Ramifications?

  • Tax impact of QDRO on plan participant--If a QDRO orders a distribution of funds from a participant's plan to a spouse or former spouse, those funds will not represent taxable income to the plan participant. The 10 percent early withdrawal penalty will not apply. If the alternate payee is a child or dependent (rather than a spouse), then the distribution will be taxed to the plan participant. In such a case, the 10 percent early withdrawal penalty will still not apply.
  • Tax impact on plan participant if there is no QDRO--If there is no QDRO and retirement plan assets are distributed to a spouse (or anyone else), then the distribution will be taxed to the plan participant. Furthermore, the 10 percent early withdrawal penalty may apply. Beware, also, of withholding requirements.
  • Tax impact of QDRO on former spouse (or alternate payee)--A spouse or former spouse who receives a distribution under a QDRO steps into the shoes of the plan participant. As a result, such distributions become taxable to the spouse rather than to the plan participant. The money will be included in the alternate payee's gross income for the year of distribution. However, any cost basis that the participant had in the plan must be apportioned. It will be allocated on a pro rata basis between the present value of the alternate payee's interest and the total present value of all the benefits payable with respect to the plan participant.

Example(s):  Assume John was married to Mary and had a vested balance in his 401(k) plan of $300,000. John had made  after-tax contributions to the plan in the amount of $30,000. When John and Mary negotiated a divorce, it was decided that Mary  would get 50 percent of the plan assets immediately ($150,000). John's $30,000 after-tax basis in the plan will be allocated to him  and Mary based on the ratio of their respective interests in the plan. Thus, $15,000 of the $150,000 distribution to Mary will be  nontaxable. The remaining $135,000 will be taxable to Mary unless she rolls this money over into an IRA within 60 days of receipt.  Since the distribution was made pursuant to a QDRO, there will not be a 10 percent early withdrawal penalty.

Tip:  Distributions to children and other dependents will be taxable to the plan participant.

  • If the alternate payee is the spouse or former spouse, the taxable part of any distribution received by such person will qualify as an eligible rollover distribution. Thus, it can be rolled over into an IRA within 60 days of receipt. If the alternate payee is a child or other dependent, the money may not be rolled over into an IRA.
  • Tax impact on former spouse if there is no QDRO--If there is no QDRO, the former spouse doesn't include the distribution in gross income; the distribution is taxable to the plan participant. Also, the plan participant may be subject to the 10 percent early withdrawal penalty. Such a distribution doesn't qualify to be rolled over into an IRA.

Tip:  Distributions from a Section 457 plan made pursuant to a QDRO are taxed under the same rules that apply to qualified plans.

What are the eligibility criteria for participation in the SEPP plan for employees of The University of Chicago, and how can factors like years of service and age impact an employee's benefits under this plan? Discuss how these criteria might have changed for new employees post-2016 and what implications this has for retirement planning.

Eligibility Criteria for SEPP: Employees at The University of Chicago become eligible to participate in the SEPP upon meeting age and service requirements: being at least 21 years old and completing one year of service. For employees hired after the plan freeze on October 31, 2016, these criteria have been crucial in determining eligibility for newer employees, impacting their retirement planning as they do not accrue benefits under SEPP beyond this freeze date.

In what ways does the SEPP (Staff Employees Pension Plan) benefit calculation at The University of Chicago reflect an employee's years of service and final average pay? Examine the formulas involved in the benefits determination process, including how outside factors such as Social Security compensation can affect the total pension benefits an employee receives at retirement.

Benefit Calculation Reflecting Service and Pay: The SEPP benefits are calculated based on the final average pay and years of participation, factoring in Social Security covered compensation. Changes post-2016 have frozen benefits accrual, meaning that current employees’ benefits are calculated only up to this freeze date, affecting long-term benefits despite continued employment.

How can employees at The University of Chicago expect their SEPP benefits to be paid out upon their retirement, especially in terms of the options between lump sum distributions and annuities? Analyze the advantages and disadvantages of each payment option, and how these choices can impact an employee's financial situation in retirement.

Payout Options (Lump Sum vs. Annuities): Upon retirement, employees can opt for a lump sum payment or annuities. Each option presents financial implications; lump sums provide immediate access to funds but annuities offer sustained income. This choice is significant for financial stability in retirement, particularly under the constraints post the 2016 plan changes.

Can you elaborate on the spousal rights associated with the pension benefits under the SEPP plan at The University of Chicago? Discuss how marital status influences annuity payments and the required spousal consent when considering changes to beneficiary designations.

Spousal Rights in SEPP Benefits: Spouses have rights to pension benefits, requiring spousal consent for altering beneficiary arrangements under the SEPP. Changes post-2016 do not impact these rights, but understanding these is vital for making informed decisions about pension benefits and beneficiary designations.

As an employee nearing retirement at The University of Chicago, what considerations should one keep in mind regarding taxes on pension benefits received from the SEPP? Explore the tax implications of different types of distributions and how they align with current IRS regulations for the 2024 tax year.

Tax Considerations for SEPP Benefits: SEPP distributions are taxable income. Employees must consider the tax implications of their chosen payout method—lump sum or annuities—and plan for potential tax liabilities. This understanding is crucial, especially with the plan’s benefit accrual freeze affecting the retirement timeline.

What resources are available for employees of The University of Chicago wishing to understand more about their retirement benefits under SEPP? Discuss the types of information that can be requested from the Benefits Office and highlight the contact methods for obtaining more detailed assistance.

Resources for Understanding SEPP Benefits: The University provides resources for employees to understand their SEPP benefits, including access to the Benefits Office for personalized queries. Utilizing these resources is essential for employees, especially newer ones post-2016, to fully understand their retirement benefits under the current plan structure.

How does The University of Chicago address benefits for employees upon their death, and what provisions exist for both spouses and non-spouse beneficiaries under the SEPP plan? Analyze the specific benefits and payment structures available to beneficiaries and the conditions under which these benefits are distributed.

Posthumous Benefits: The SEPP includes provisions for spouses and non-spouse beneficiaries, detailing the continuation or lump sum payments upon the death of the employee. Understanding these provisions is crucial for estate planning and ensuring financial security for beneficiaries.

What factors ensure an employee remains fully vested in their pension benefits with The University of Chicago, and how does the vesting schedule affect retirement planning strategies? Consider the implications of not fulfilling the vesting criteria and how this might influence decisions around employment tenure and retirement timing.

Vesting and Retirement Planning: Vesting in SEPP requires three years of service, with full benefits contingent on meeting this criterion. For employees navigating post-2016 changes, understanding vesting is crucial for retirement planning, particularly as no additional benefits accrue beyond the freeze date.

Discuss the impact of a Qualified Domestic Relations Order (QDRO) on the SEPP benefits for employees at The University of Chicago. How do divorce or separation proceedings influence pension benefits, and what steps should employees take to ensure compliance with a QDRO?

Impact of QDROs on SEPP Benefits: SEPP complies with Qualified Domestic Relations Orders, which can allocate pension benefits to alternate payees. Understanding how QDROs affect one’s benefits is crucial for financial planning, especially in the context of marital dissolution.

How can employees at The University of Chicago, who have questions about their benefits under the SEPP plan, effectively communicate with the Benefits Office for clarity and assistance? Specify the various communication methods available for employees and what kind of information or support they can expect to receive.

Communicating with the Benefits Office: Employees can reach out to the Benefits Office via email or phone for detailed assistance on their SEPP benefits. Effective communication with this office is vital for employees to clarify their benefits status, particularly in light of the post-2016 changes to the plan.

New call-to-action

For more information you can reach the plan administrator for University of Chicago at , ; or by calling them at .

*Please see disclaimer for more information